Build Stronger Cases with
Minnesota Sentencing Data

  • Access 350,000+ Minnesota court records
  • Find precedents and sentencing patterns
  • Build stronger arguments with hard data
Start For Free
No credit card required
Continue with Google
Minnesota Case Data Table

Fast Access

Query instantly across 20+ years of cases

Deep Analysis

Build insights from sentencing patterns

Powerful Filtering

Find exactly the cases you need

What Makes Our Platform Powerful

Data You Can Trust

Comprehensive Minnesota Case Database

Access 350,000+ records from all Minnesota judicial districts (2001-Present), with rich metadata on cases, defendants, judges, and outcomes.

  • 350,000+ Minnesota criminal cases
  • Full demographic and offender data
  • Complete sentencing information
Powerful Filtering

Advanced Search and Filtering

Find exactly the cases you need with our comprehensive filtering system. Identify precedents and comparable cases in minutes, not hours.

  • Filter by judge, statute, district, county, race, severity, and sex
  • Search by specific sentencing criteria and outcomes
  • Quickly compare sentencing in similar cases
Data-Driven Arguments

Statistical Analysis and Sentencing Patterns

Strengthen your legal strategy by identifying sentencing patterns and potential disparities across Minnesota courts.

  • Identify judge-specific tendencies with supporting data
  • Support arguments by comparing sentencing across demographics
  • Validate or challenge assumptions with hard data

Pricing Plans

Loading pricing...

Real-World Impact

See how data transforms legal outcomes

Case Study
"The judge stated they didn't grant certain sentences for cases like my client's. I presented data showing six instances where they did, for individuals with similar or higher scores. It forced a moment of reconsideration, highlighting how crucial objective data is to counter assumptions, even from the bench."

Transform Your Legal Strategy with Minnesota Case Data

Gain a competitive edge with data-backed arguments that judges and opposing counsel can't ignore